Aborted Fetuses to Star in 2012 Election Ads
Anti-abortion activists are running for office in 2012, but not necessarily to win. They want to take advantage of an FCC loophole that will allow them to run grisly "campaign" ads decrying abortion that would never get on air otherwise.
David Lewis will not be the next congressman from Ohio's 8th District. But for Lewis, an unemployed former IT technician who is challenging House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) in next year's Republican primary, winning isn't the objective.
By running for federal office, Lewis can compel local television stations to run grisly anti-abortion ads that would otherwise never stand a chance of making it on the air. Emphasis on grisly: Lewis' ads feature what purport to be dismembered fetuses, tied together in neat little bundles, or simply mangled beyond recognition. "The FCC says that 45 days out from a primary and 60 days out from a general election, we can run ads on a television station with FCC licenses—unedited, uncensored, they can't deny it as long as we buy the spot," he explains.
Lewis isn't alone. He is one of a handful of anti-abortion activists who have been recruited by Randall Terry, founder of the anti-abortion group Society for Truth and Justice, to run for office in metropolitan areas across the country. Together, they aim to exploit a Federal Communications Commission loophole and saturate major media markets with graphic anti-abortion images. What the ads lack in production values, they more than make up for in shock value. As he explained in an interview with Catholic Online last November, Terry, who is himself running for president as a Democrat, explained: "By running campaign ads in the top 25 media markets, we can reach one-third of the nation with a message about the truth and horror of abortion."
Read more at Mother Jones
- Tags: 2012, abortion, Choice, Reproductive Rights



Comments (1)
One of the best reasons for the panissg the ERA is because of how these kinds of things work on culture and identity over time.We Americans seem to have inculcated our Consitution into our psyche in a profound way, maybe rivaled only by the French in that regard. So I think that giving the fundamental assumption of equality between the sexes Constitutional status, and thereby marking it in American culture as an inalienable right, works over time because it becomes part of the bedrock of American identity. And it does so in a way that a right cobbled together from pieces of legislation here or there does not.Of course we may not always live up to the ideals of that identity, so to speak. But at least we always compare ourselves to it to see how we're doing.